Boundary-Crossing Strategies: Managing Macro Policies in a Federal Government

Author:

Cavalcante Pedro1ORCID,Lotta Gabriela Spanghero2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, Brazil

2. Fundação Getulio Vargas, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: this paper aims to analyze boundary-crossing strategies, henceforth BCS, a complex and relatively new coordination trend in public administration. To do so, we investigated how three prioritized coordination policies from different sectors were designed and implemented in Brazil. Methods: following a literature review on BCS, the paper employs content analysis of the programs’ legislation and government white papers. To understand how the programs actually functioned, we interviewed key government stakeholders. Results: they suggest that two macro policies incorporated most of the boundary-crossing features in their formal design and, more importantly, implementation processes. However, the degree to which these characteristics are present varies according to the research focus or the interviewee’s position. Conclusions: main findings of BCS strategy are that policy effectiveness and continuity depend on the consensus of different stakeholders about policy goals; the empowerment of leaders; adoption of new coordination instruments; and continuing policy prioritization. Finally, by exploring the adaptation of an international trend to the Brazilian public administration context, the paper shows crucial insights for innovation in terms of policy coordination and implementation.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Reference51 articles.

1. Trajetória recente da gestão pública brasileira: Um balanço crítico e a renovação da agenda de Reformas;Abrucio F. L.;Revista de Administração Pública - RAP,2007

2. Burocracia e política no Brasil: Desafios para o estado democrático no século XXI;Arantes R. B.,2010

3. Avanços, equívocos e instabilidade das políticas de inovação no Brasil;Arbix G.;Novos estudos CEBRAP,2017

4. Institutional polycentrism, entrepreneurs’ social networks, and new venture growth;Batjargal B.;Academy of Management Journal,2013

5. The final outcomes of the review of public administration in Northern Ireland. Tensions and compatibility with devolution, parity and modernization;Birrell D.;Public Administration,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3