The Impossibility of Open Science without Otherness and Epistemic Plurality

Author:

Bispo Marcelo de Souza1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Brazil; Journal of Contemporary Administration, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT My objective in this text is to present a counterpoint to the positivist bias that has dominated the debate on open science and eventually highlight some problems and provide a more plural and inclusive perspective on the subject. I reflect on three key points that have pervaded the debate on open science, namely: (a) open access to the knowledge produced, (b) transparency in research processes, and (c) replication and reproducibility of previous research. My focus is on highlighting the need for a plural and inclusive view of science, one which is grounded on otherness assumptions.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Reference29 articles.

1. Science’s reproducibility and replicability crisis: International business is not immune;Aguinis H.;Journal of International Business Studies,2017

2. Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants;Aguinis H.;Strategic Management Journal,2019

3. The ethics of management research: An exploratory content analysis;Bell E.;British Journal of Management,2007

4. A sombra das revistas predatórias no Brasil: Estudo mostra quantos pesquisadores do país publicam em periódicos com práticas suspeitas;Bernardi S.;Pesquisa FAPESP,2018

5. Campos das Ciências Sociais: Figuras do mosaico das pesquisas no Brasil e em Portugal;Bispo M. de S.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3