Open Government in São Paulo: An Analysis of Open Public Policies

Author:

Oliveira Daniel José Silva1ORCID,Ckagnazaroff Ivan Beck1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: to identify how and when the open government principles, specifically transparency, participation, and collaboration, are being incorporated into the public policy cycle phases in local governments. Theoretical framework: theories related to public policy analysis and open government. Method: a single case study with an incorporated focus on the open government initiative of the São Paulo City Hall, where three distinct public policies were analyzed from a theoretical-analytical framework built by integrating the approach of the public policy cycle with the three open government principles. Results: the study showed that in none of the analyzed policies there was the full incorporation of these principles in the five phases of the policy cycle and that little progress was made regarding the requirements for them to be considered open policies. Conclusions: the study contributes to narrowing the theoretical-methodological gap concerning the effectiveness of open government initiatives. The method offers conditions to be applied in different realities and can be used in future research to better understand how open government principles are being incorporated into public policies of governments that have signed open government commitments.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Public Administration,Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference73 articles.

1. Modelos de análise das políticas públicas;Araújo L.;Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas,2017

2. A ladder of citizen participation;Arnstein S. R.;Journal of the American Institute of Planners,1969

3. A systematic review of open government data initiatives;Attard J.;Government Information Quarterly,2015

4. La gestion des communautés de connaissances au sein des espaces de créativité et innovation: Une variété de logiques de collaboration;Aubouin N.;Innovations,2019

5. The different designs of public participation in Brazil: Deliberation, power sharing and public ratification;Avritzer L.;Critical Policy Studies,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3