Clues for the Paradigmatic Development of Online Qualitative Methods

Author:

Melo Newton Claizoni Moreno de1ORCID,Dourado Débora Coutinho Paschoal1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: in this paper, we problematize how online methods were reduced to mere adaptations from previous data collection techniques, and then discuss how some of the idiosyncratic properties of the online scope may drive the development of future, paradigmatic, online qualitative methods. Proposition: we identified five clues for the paradigmatic development of online qualitative methods: (1) the new socialities allowed by online interactions; (2) the processes involved in asserting identities and selves online; (3) the increasing difficulty in distinguishing what is private and what is public online, and what does privacy mean in this context; (4) the increase of participants’ agency in online qualitative research; and (5) the declining distinction between offline and online social phenomena. Conclusion: by using ontological and epistemological assumptions that do not consider the specificities of online experiences, and by focusing excessively on adapting known methods to the new settings, we researchers are bound to conceive the online experience and operate in it using offline categories. This way, we might be missing the opportunity to develop native, paradigmatic, online qualitative methods that, ultimately, would allow for a better understanding of the phenomena we investigate.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Reference60 articles.

1. Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder;Anwyl-Irvine A.;Behavior Research Methods,2020

2. Exploring ethical and methodological issues in internet-based research with adolescents;Battles H. T.;International Journal of Qualitative Methods,2010

3. Internet inquiry: Conversations about method;Baym N.,2009

4. From co-location to co-presence: Shifts in the use of ethnography for the study of knowledge;Beaulieu A.;Social Studies of Science,2010

5. Anonymity as a double-edge sword: Reflecting on the implications of online qualitative research in studying sensitive topics;Bouchard K. L.;The Qualitative Report,2016

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Etnografia organizacional em um mundo permeado pela tecnologia digital;Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Administrativa;2023-06-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3