Evaluation of diagnosis and treatment practices of Brazilian neurologists among patients with multiple sclerosis

Author:

Marin Cássia Elisa1ORCID,Callegaro Dagoberto2ORCID,Lana-Peixoto Marco Aurélio3ORCID,Fernández Oscar4ORCID,Gomes Neto Antonio Pereira5ORCID,Vasconcelos Claudia Cristina Ferreira6ORCID,d’Almeida José Artur Costa7ORCID,Gonçalves Marcus Vinícius Magno8ORCID,Mendes Maria Fernanda9ORCID,Parolin Mônica Koncke Fiuza10ORCID,Nascimento Osvaldo11ORCID,Gama Paulo Diniz da12ORCID,Dias-Carneiro Rafael Paternò Castello9ORCID,Dias Ronaldo Maciel13ORCID,Damasceno Alfredo14ORCID,Becker Jefferson15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

2. Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo, Brazil

3. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil

4. University of Malaga, Spain

5. Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte, Brazil

6. Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

7. Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Brazil

8. Universidade da Região de Joinville, Brazil

9. Santa Casa de São Paulo, Brazil

10. Clínica Gonçalves Dias, Brazil

11. Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brazil

12. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Brazil

13. Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brazil

14. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil

15. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Recent changes to the diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) and new medications have had a major impact on the way in which specialists manage the disease. Objective: To investigate factors considered by Brazilian neurologists in managing MS, and to identify how these contribute to diagnosis and treatment. Methods: Potential participants were selected by a steering committee (MS experts who developed this survey). Only MS specialists were included in the study (neurologists who had completed a neuroimmunology fellowship or who were treating more than 30 MS patients). Links to the online questionnaire were distributed between March 2019 and January 2020. This questionnaire was composed of sections with hypothetical MS scenarios. Results: Neurologists from 13 Brazilian states responded to the survey (n = 94). In the clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) scenario, the respondents agreed to treat patients with a high risk of MS diagnosis, whereas in the radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) half of the respondents opted not to treat, even among high-risk patients. In cases of low-activity relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), the choice of treatment was distributed among interferon beta, glatiramer acetate and teriflunomide, which were changed to fingolimod and natalizumab, as RRMS severity increased. The topics in which disagreement was found included practices regarding use of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for pregnant patients and the washout period required for some DMTs. Conclusions: This study enabled identification of areas of agreement and disagreement about MS treatment among Brazilian neurologists, which can be used to update future protocols and improve patient management.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Neurology,Neurology (clinical)

Reference33 articles.

1. Multiple sclerosis;Compston A;Lancet,2002

2. Multiple sclerosis;Compston A;Lancet,2008

3. Multiple sclerosis;Reich DS;N Engl J Med,2018

4. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria;Polman CH;Ann Neurol,2011

5. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria;Thompson AJ;Lancet Neurol,2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3