A SCIENTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF INSTITUTIONS IN THE INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS RESEARCH

Author:

Vasconcellos Sílvio Luís de1ORCID,Monticelli Jefferson Marlon2ORCID,Santos André Moraes dos3ORCID,Falaster Christian4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing, Brasil

2. Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Brasil

3. Universidade do Vale do Itajaí, Brasil

4. Universidade Regional de Blumenau, Brasil

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper explores the co-evolution of international business studies and institutions, employing a scientometric approach and bibliometric review on the application of institutional concepts in international business studies, outlining a research agenda. We compiled a database of 3,520 articles and conducted a scientometric analysis to examine the evolution of the term “institutions” in international business in ABS-ranked journals. Our findings show that (1) over the past two decades, there has been a shift in the use of the term institutions from a political and economic connotation to a sociological perspective to explain how firms adopt strategies, make decisions, and address intra-national problems during the internationalization process; (2) traditional approaches were found to be insufficient in explaining context-dependent events that affect international business; and (3) China has emerged as a critical player in international business studies, which has helped to redirect the focus of institutions from political and economic aspects to the sociological context. Finally, we propose an agenda for future research, highlighting potential pitfalls and remedies.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Reference83 articles.

1. Revisiting the scientometric conceptualization of impact and its measurement;Abramo G.;Journal of Informetrics,2018

2. Socio-Cultural Distance and the Choice of Joint Ventures: A contingency perspective;Agarwal S.;Journal of International Marketing,1994

3. Re-examining regional borders and the multinational enterprise;Aguilera R. V.;The Multinational Business Review,2015

4. The dubious role of institutions in international business: A road forward;Aguilera R. V.;Journal of International Business Studies,2019

5. Academic Journal Guide,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3