Affiliation:
1. University of Lisbon, Portugal
Abstract
ABSTRACT The scholars of New Developmentalism have generated a substantial body of knowledge regarding structural transformation and the policies that should be adopted to foster its achievement. Nevertheless, as is argued in this paper, New Developmentalism, by contrast with Neoliberalism, lacks a strong philosophical foundation to legitimise the policies it favours on grounds other than their ability to generate prosperity. It is also argued that new-developmentalists should explicitly adopt a pragmatic philosophy in order to become a more serious alternative to other political economy doctrines.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science
Reference53 articles.
1. Brazil’s liberal neo-developmentalism: New paradigm or edited orthodoxy?;Ban C.;Review of International Political Economy,2013
2. Ruling ideas: How global neoliberalism goes local;Ban C.,2016
3. An ‘unproductive labour’ view of finance;Barba A.;Cambridge Journal of Economics,2012
4. The great transformation in understanding Polanyi: Reply to Hejeebu and McCloskey;Blyth M.;Critical Review,2004
5. The Legacy of Milton and Rose Friedman’s “Free to Choose”: Economic Liberalism at the Turn of the 21st Century;Boettke P.,2004
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献