Affiliation:
1. Fundação Getúlio Vargas de São Paulo, Brasil
2. University of Notre Dame, USA
Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper criticizes the idea, widespread today, of the need to seek micro-foundations for macroeconomics. The authors argue that these two fields of economics, micro and macroeconomics, use different methodological approaches. Microeconomics deals with economic problems according to a logical-deductive methodology, while macroeconomics is more characterized by a historical-inductive approach. The attempt to reduce macroeconomics to microeconomics, or vice versa, brings only an impoverishment to science and economic debate, in which, ideally, there should be room for a great pluralism of ideas and theoretical currents.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science
Reference60 articles.
1. Microeconomic foundations of macroeconomics in the post-Keynesian approach;AGLIARDI E.;Metroeconomica,1988
2. For Marx;ALTHUSSER L.,1970
3. Economics as Discourse;AMARIGLIO J.,1990
4. Keynes, Knowledge and Uncertainty;AMARIGLIO J.,1994
5. Methodological individualism and social knowledge;ARROW K.;American Economic Review,1994
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献