Affiliation:
1. Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The Brazilian government has over the past years promulgated a mix of orthodox and heterodox policies for Brazil's economic development. This paper seeks to test whether the existing economic ideas have been prescriptive in formulating the policies, or whether they have been the outcome of the "infusion of private interests" (Katzenstein, 1978) in the policy making process. To this end, the paper charts the origins of the unilateral opening for trade in the agribusiness and contrasts them with the policy process in the car industry, where trade barriers have been erected. The article will identify the channels through which private actors informed the government's interventions and show that the industry bodies have largely prodded the government. The resulting policy maze has left both the representatives of the orthodox as well those of the heterodox approach unsatisfied and has failed to halt Brazil's dwindling manufacturing capabilities.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science
Reference53 articles.
1. From interdependence to neo-mercantilism: Brazilian capitalism in the age of globalization;Abu-El-Haj Jawdat;Latin American Perspectives,2007
2. Do WTO rules preclude industrial policy? Evidence from the global economic crisis;Aggarwal Vinod K.;Business and Politcs,2014
3. Mass democracy: The real reason that Brazil ended inflation?;Armijo Leslie Elliott;World Development,2005
4. Market, state and society in contemporary Latin America;Armijo Leslie Elliott,2010
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献