Affiliation:
1. State University of Rio de Janeiro; Freie Universität Berlin
2. Federal University of Rio de Janeiro; State University of Rio de Janeiro
Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper analyzes the restrictions imposed by financialization on domestic policy space, especially in emerging economies, in light of the actions of credit rating agencies. The working hypothesis is that these agencies, in their interaction with governments, act to constrain the policy space from their position in the international financial system. Thereby, they operate in favor of the financial markets’ agenda through the issuance of sovereign ratings and at the discursive level. The methodology draws on the case study of Brazil, based on sovereign ratings and reports issued by S&P Global, Moody’s, and Fitch Ratings, which shows that such agencies have a vast repertoire to promote the orthodox neoliberal agenda in the national political and economic process.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science
Reference66 articles.
1. Nota oficial da Fazenda e BC: Decisão da Fitch é extemporânea e equivocada,2002
2. Rating politics? Partisan discrimination in credit ratings in developed economies;Barta Zófia;Comparative Political Studies,2017
3. Financialization as calculative practice: The rise of structured finance and the cultural and calculative transformation of credit rating agencies;Besedovsky Natalia;Socio-Economic Review,2017
4. Alternativas para o Desenvolvimento brasileiro: novos horizontes para a mudança estrutural com igualdade;Biancarelli André,2019
5. Séries Temporais,2022
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献