Patients in insulin analogues use via judicial litigation: do they use the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS)?

Author:

Mendonça Thays Santos1ORCID,Silva Eduardo Sérgio1ORCID,Pereira Mariana Linhares1ORCID,Obreli-Neto Paulo Roque2ORCID,Belo Vinícius Silva1ORCID,Ferreira Gustavo Costa1ORCID,Chaves Paula Resende Daher1,Leite Silvana Nair3ORCID,Baldoni André Oliveira1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal de São João Del Rei, Brasil

2. Universidades Integradas de Ourinhos, Brasil

3. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brasil

Abstract

Abstract Background Studies show that among the drugs most commonly used in judicial litigation in Brazil, are those used to treat diabetes mellitus, especially insulin analogues. Objective Evaluate the use of the Unified Health System (SUS) by patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), who receive insulin analogues through judicial action, before and after this process. Method In a retrospective longitudinal observational study, secondary data was used from these patients in Minas Gerais, Brazil, in 2018. Socio-demographic information was collected and related to the follow-up of these patients in the SUS. The McNemar χ2 test was used to compare the proportions of the variables. Results Of the 89 patients analyzed, women (53.9%) were predominant. Most patients were aged between 20 and 39 years (52.8%), and more than half, 55.1%, use only a private health system. After the judicial action, there was a significant increase (p <0.05) in the number of patients who had consultations in primary health care (from 19.1% to 30.3%) and emergency medical appointments (from 1.1% to 9.0%). Conclusion It is observed that the majority of patients with T1DM via judicial action in the SUS are not monitored by this health system through examinations, consultations, and hospitalizations.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Reference23 articles.

1. Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil. Constitution of 1988,1988

2. Right to medicines. Evaluation of drug costs in the federal scope of the Unified Health System between 2008 and 2015;David G,2016

3. Ordinance nº 2.577, of October, 27, 2006. Approves the exceptional dispensing drug componente as part of Public Health System’s national pharmaceutical care policy,2006

4. Ordinance nº 204, of January, 29, 2007. Regulates the financing and transfer of Federal Resources to health actions and services in the form of financing blocks, with the respective monitoring and control,2007

5. Ordinance nº 2.982, of November, 26, 2009. Approves the implementation and financing rules for pharmaceutical care in primary care,2009

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3