Psychological empowerment of health professionals

Author:

Salles Bianca Gomes1ORCID,Dias Flávia Carvalho Pena2ORCID,Perissotto Samantha2ORCID,Andrade Juliane Custódio de2ORCID,Dini Ariane Polidoro2ORCID,Gasparino Renata Cristina2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Vera Cruz Casa de Saúde Campinas, Brasil

2. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brasil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To assess whether there are differences in psychological empowerment between different health professionals working in a teaching hospital. Method: A comparative, quantitative, and cross-sectional study carried out with 165 professionals selected at random and who worked in a teaching hospital in the inland of the state of São Paulo. The participants were divided into three groups: 1) nurses, 2) physicians, and 3) other professionals (physiotherapists, psychologists, pharmacists, speech therapists, social workers, and nutritionists). For data collection, a form was used to characterize the sample, as well as the Brazilian version of the Psychological Empowerment Instrument. To compare the scores between the three groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used, followed by Dunn' post-test. Results: Nurses, physicians, and other professionals scored 71.4; 69.3, and 71.1 points (p=0.5959), respectively, in the total score of the instrument Conclusion: There are no statistically significant differences in the perception of psychological empowerment of different health professionals. Conclusion: There are no statistically significant differences in the perception of psychological empowerment of different health professionals.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Psychological Empowerment Instrument for the Brazilian context;Schumaher MLN;Rev Min Enferm,2017

2. Clinical leadership, structural empowerment and psychological empowerment of registered nurses working in an emergency department;Connolly M;J Nurs Manag,2018

3. Nursing Perspectives and the “Nursing Now” Campaign;Cassiani SHB;Rev Bras Enferm,2018

4. Nursing now campaign: raising the status of nurses;Crisp N;Lancet,2018

5. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: construct definition, measurement and validation;Spreitzer GM;Acad Manage J,1995

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3