Affiliation:
1. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
2. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Abstract
The study of circadian typology differences has increased in the last few years. As a result, new instruments have been developed to estimate the individual circadian phase of temporal human behavior, also referred as chronotype. The current review was conducted to evaluate the differences among the questionnaires most frequently used to assess chronotype: the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), the Composite Scale of Morningness (CSM), and the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ). Each instrument evaluates a different aspect of chronotype. MEQ is considered to evaluate the phase preferences of individual behavior over a 24-hour day, while MCTQ measures the phase of sleep positions for both free and work days. CSM is similar to MEQ, but is more sensitive to measure shift work. The concept of chronotype has been used to refer to phase positions or phase preferences in the literature reviewed. Most of the time this is a consequence of different interpretations: it is not clear whether phase preferences are a direct manifestation of the individual’s internal clock or a result of external cues, e.g., social interaction (including the alarm clock). Also, phase preferences are not uniform throughout life. Therefore, a single assessment, not taking age into consideration, will not accurately describe the sample. We suggest that MCTQ is the best instrument for investigators dealing with desynchronization and as an instrument for sleep phase. Conversely, if the goal is to assess characteristics that change under specific situations - chronotype -, the MEQ should be used.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine
Reference63 articles.
1. A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms;Horne JA;Int J Chronobiol,1976
2. Latitude and social habits as determinants of the distribution of morning and evening types in Brazil;Benedito-Silva A;Biol Rhythm Res,1998
3. Epidemiology of the human circadian clock;Roenneberg T;Sleep Med Rev,2007
4. Inter-individual differences in the human circadian system: a review;Kerkhof GA;Biol Psychol,1985
5. Gender differences in morningness-eveningness preference;Adan A;Chronobiol Int,2002
Cited by
118 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献