Affiliation:
1. Universidade Federal do Ceará, Brasil
Abstract
ABSTRACT High cost and long time required to determine a retention curve by the conventional methods of the Richards Chamber and Haines Funnel limit its use; therefore, alternative methods to facilitate this routine are needed. The filter paper method to determine the soil water retention curve was evaluated and compared to the conventional method. Undisturbed samples were collected from five different soils. Using a Haines Funnel and Richards Chamber, moisture content was obtained for tensions of 2; 4; 6; 8; 10; 33; 100; 300; 700; and 1,500 kPa. In the filter paper test, the soil matric potential was obtained from the filter-paper calibration equation, and the moisture subsequently determined based on the gravimetric difference. The van Genuchten model was fitted to the observed data of soil matric potential versus moisture. Moisture values of the conventional and the filter paper methods, estimated by the van Genuchten model, were compared. The filter paper method, with R2 of 0.99, can be used to determine water retention curves of agricultural soils as an alternative to the conventional method.
Subject
Soil Science,Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference23 articles.
1. ASTM-D 5298-03. Standard test method for measurement of soil potential (suction) using filter paper,2003
2. Development of suction measurement techniques to quantify the water retention behaviour of GCLs;Beddoe RA;Geosynth Int,2010
3. Indirect measurement of suction;Bulut R;Geotech Geol Eng,2008
4. Free energy of water-suction-in filter papers;Bulut R;Geotech Test J,2005
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献