MANAGERIAL COMPETENCIES AND RESULTS IN RESEARCH GROUPS

Author:

FREITAS PABLO F. P. DE1ORCID,ODELIUS CATARINA C.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade de Brasília, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose: The aim of this paper is to identify relationships between “managerial competencies” (MCs) and the resulting extension in Brazilian “research groups” (RGs), as well as differences resulting from sociodemographic/functional characteristics. Originality/value: Just like general organizations, RGs need to invest in aspects that enhance their results, taking more strategic approaches to efficiently gather and manage resources and establish networks and partnerships, features that are influenced by the leader’s competencies, which are not always satisfactorily displayed. In addition, the study is innovative in applying a scale of results in RGs (for the first time), identifying their relationships with MCs. Design/methodology/approach: We employed the Correlation Analysis (Kendall-Tau) and Difference tests between medians (Mann-Whitney and Kruskall-Wallis) from the questionnaires electronically completed by 387 RG leaders who accepted the invitation that was sent to 6,723 researchers. Findings: The study was based on scales with validity evidence, and its findings indicate that to achieve better results, it is not enough for the RGs leaders to control the management of people and research results; they also need to dedicate themselves to gathering resources and people because these MCs are more related to results in RGs. We also identified differences resulting from educational level, gender, scholarship grants, knowledge area, and/or research experience and group relation time.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference64 articles.

1. Grupos de investigación en contextos organizacionales académicos: Una reflexión sobre los procesos de cambio y los retos futuros;Alonso M.;Investigación Bibliotecológica,2008

2. A influência das percepções de benefícios, resultados e dificuldades dos grupos de pesquisa sobre as interações com empresas;Araujo V.;Revista Brasileira de Inovação,2015

3. Grupos de pesquisa de educação em enfermagem do Brasil;Backes V.;Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP,2012

4. Academic research groups: Evaluation of their quality and quality of their evaluation;Berche B.;Journal of Physics: Conference Series,2016

5. Causas e efeitos da expressão de competências no trabalho: Para entender melhor a noção de competência;Brandão H.;Revista de Administração Mackenzie,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3