Affiliation:
1. São Paulo University, Brazil
Abstract
This work aimed at comparing the accuracy of the psychiatric diagnoses made under indirect supervision to the diagnoses obtained through Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). The study was conducted in 3 university services (outpatient, inpatient and emergency). Data from the emergency service were collected 3 years later, after changes in the training process of the medical staff in psychiatric diagnosis. The sensitivity for Major Depression (outpatient 10.0%; inpatients 60.0%, emergency 90.0%) and Schizophrenia (44.4%; 55.0%; 80.0%) improved over time. The reliability was poor in the outpatient service (Kw = 0.18), and at admission to the inpatient service (Kw = 0.38). The diagnosis elaborated in the discharge of the inpatient service (Kw = 0.55) and in the emergency service (Kw = 0.63) was good. Systematic training of supervisors and residents in operational diagnostic criteria increased the accuracy of psychiatric diagnoses elaborated under indirect supervision, although excellent reliability was not achieved.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference17 articles.
1. Supervising intake diagnosis: A psychiatric "Rashomon";Spitzer RL;Arch Gen Psychiatry.,1982
2. Identifying common errors in the use of DSM-III through diagnostic supervision;Skodol AE;Hosp Community Psychiatry.,1984
3. Diagnostic criteria of American and British psychiatrists;Kendell RE;Arch Gen Psychiatry.,1971
4. Reliability in the DSM-III field trials: interview v case summary;Hyler SE;Arch Gen Psychiatry.,1982
5. Supervision of the resident's initial interview;Schuster DB;Arch Gen Psychiatry.,1970
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献