Accuracy of psychiatric diagnosis performed under indirect supervision

Author:

Del-Ben Cristina Marta1,Hallak Jaime Eduardo Cecílio1,Sponholz Jr Alcion1,Marques João Mazzoncini de Azevedo1,Labate Cybelli Morelo1,Contel José Onildo Betioli1,Zuardi Antonio Waldo1

Affiliation:

1. São Paulo University, Brazil

Abstract

This work aimed at comparing the accuracy of the psychiatric diagnoses made under indirect supervision to the diagnoses obtained through Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). The study was conducted in 3 university services (outpatient, inpatient and emergency). Data from the emergency service were collected 3 years later, after changes in the training process of the medical staff in psychiatric diagnosis. The sensitivity for Major Depression (outpatient 10.0%; inpatients 60.0%, emergency 90.0%) and Schizophrenia (44.4%; 55.0%; 80.0%) improved over time. The reliability was poor in the outpatient service (Kw = 0.18), and at admission to the inpatient service (Kw = 0.38). The diagnosis elaborated in the discharge of the inpatient service (Kw = 0.55) and in the emergency service (Kw = 0.63) was good. Systematic training of supervisors and residents in operational diagnostic criteria increased the accuracy of psychiatric diagnoses elaborated under indirect supervision, although excellent reliability was not achieved.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference17 articles.

1. Supervising intake diagnosis: A psychiatric "Rashomon";Spitzer RL;Arch Gen Psychiatry.,1982

2. Identifying common errors in the use of DSM-III through diagnostic supervision;Skodol AE;Hosp Community Psychiatry.,1984

3. Diagnostic criteria of American and British psychiatrists;Kendell RE;Arch Gen Psychiatry.,1971

4. Reliability in the DSM-III field trials: interview v case summary;Hyler SE;Arch Gen Psychiatry.,1982

5. Supervision of the resident's initial interview;Schuster DB;Arch Gen Psychiatry.,1970

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3