Affiliation:
1. Anhembi Morumbi University, Brazil
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective: to analyze the profile of appendectomies performed in the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS) and to compare the laparoscopic and laparotomic techniques of appendectomy. Methods: This work used information from DataSus from 2008 to 2014 (http://datasus.saude.gov.br). We compared the data of patients submitted to laparotomic appendectomy with those submitted to laparoscopic one. Results: when comparing the total growth of appendectomies, the laparoscopic route increased 279.7%, while the increase in laparotomic surgery was 25% (p <0.001) in the study period. With regard to medical and hospital costs, laparoscopic appendectomy accounted for only 2.6% of the total expenditure on appendectomies performed by the Unified Health System (SUS) hospitals, with an average cost 7.6% lower than that of laparotomy procedures, but without statistical significance. The mortality rate was 57.1% lower in the laparoscopic approach when compared with laparotomy. Conclusion: there has been a significant increase in the laparoscopic route in the treatment of appendicitis, but the method is still rarely used in SUS patients. The costs of laparoscopic appendectomy were similar to those observed in laparotomic access.
Reference16 articles.
1. Apendicite aguda: análise institucional no manejo peri-operatório;Franzon O;Arq Bras Cir Dig,2009
2. Endoscopic appendectomy;Semm K;Endoscopy,1983
3. Conservative management of acute appendicitis;Malik AA;J Gastrointest Surg,2009
4. Plasträo apendicular: tratamento conservador com apendicectomia eletiva retardada;Santos Júnior JCM;Rev Col Bras Cir,1990
5. Técnica cirúrgica: Bases anatômicas, fisiopatológicas e técnica cirúrgica;Goffi FS,2007
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献