Alcohol (70%) versus alcoholic chlorhexidine solution (0.5%) in skin antisepsis for neuraxial blocks: a randomized clinical trial

Author:

TOSTES LUIZ CARLOS SOUZA1,LOYOLA ANA BEATRIZ ALKMIM TEIXEIRA2,FRAGA ADILSON DE OLIVEIRA3,GAZZI LETÍCIA AZEVEDO1,PAIVA LUIZ FRANCISLEY DE4,JULIANO YARA5,VEIGA DANIELA FRANCESCATO6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí, Brazil

2. Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí, Brazil; Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí, Brazil; Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí, Brazil

3. Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí, Brazil; Hospital e Maternidade Santa Paula, Brasil

4. Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí, Brazil; Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí, Brazil

5. Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí, Brazil; Universidade Santo Amaro, Brazil; Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí, Brazil

6. Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí, Brazil; Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the use of 0.5% alcoholic chlorhexidine and 70% alcohol in skin antisepsis for neuraxial blocks. Method: this is a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial, with two parallel arms. Seventy patients who were candidates for neuraxial block were randomly allocated to group A (n = 35), in whom antisepsis was performed with 0.5% alcoholic chlorhexidine, or to group B (n = 35), in whom we used 70% hydrated ethyl alcohol. Swabs were harvested for culture at three times: before antisepsis, two minutes after application of the antiseptic, and immediately after puncture. The samples were sown in three culture media and the number of colony forming units (CFU) per cm² was counted. Results: there was no difference between the groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, time to perform the block or type of block. There were no differences between groups in the CFU/cm² counts before antisepsis. There was less bacterial growth in group B two minutes after application of the antiseptic (p = 0.048), but there was no difference between the groups regarding the number of CFU/cm² at the end of the puncture. Conclusion: 70% alcohol was more effective in reducing the number of CFU/cm² after two minutes, and there was no difference between the two groups regarding skin colonization at the end of the procedure. These results suggest that 70% alcohol may be an option for skin antisepsis before neuraxial blocks. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02833376.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Surgery

Reference30 articles.

1. Miller's Anesthesia.;Miller RD,2014

2. Recomendações da Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia para Segurança em Anestesia Regional;Fernandes CRF;Rev Bras Anestesiol,2011

3. A survey of aseptic precautions and needle type for paediatric caudal block in Australia and New Zealand;Fahy CJ;Anaesth Intensive Care,2013

4. Alcohols for skin antisepsis at clinically relevant skin sites;Reichel M;Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2009

5. ASRA Practice Advisory on Neurologic Complications in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine;Neal JM;Reg Anesth Pain Med,2008

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Skin antiseptic solutions for a central neuraxial block. How to do it in daily clinical practice;Journal of Anesthesia and Critical Care: Open access;2024-03-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3