Limitations of using the DATASUS database as a primary source of data in surgical research: a scoping review

Author:

VIANA SOFIA WAGEMAKER1ORCID,FALEIRO MATHEUS DANIEL2ORCID,MENDES ANNA LUIZA FONTES2ORCID,TORQUATO AMANDA CIPRIANO3ORCID,TAVARES CLARA PEREIRA OLIVEIRA4ORCID,FERES BRENDA1ORCID,FERNANDEZ MIGUEL GODEIRO5ORCID,SOBREIRA ITALLO ROMERO MARQUES6ORCID,AQUINO CAROLINE MARQUES DE7ORCID,ABIB SIMONE DE CAMPOS VIEIRA8ORCID,BOTELHO FABIO9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Kursk State Medical University, Rússia

2. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil

3. Universidade Vale do Rio Doce, Brazil

4. Universidade Salvador, Brazil

5. Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Brazil

6. Centro Universitário Tocantinense Presidente Antônio Carlos, Brasil

7. Universidade Nove de Julho, Brazil

8. Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil

9. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil; The Montreal Children’s Hospital, Harvey E. Beardmore Division of Pediatric Surgery, Canadá

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: DATASUS is the Brazilian Public Unified Health System (SUS) department responsible for providing health data that are used as a primary source of data in several studies on surgery and surgical specialties although its main limitations have not been previously reviewed. The objective of this work is to synthesize information from studies on surgery that used DATASUS systems as a data source and to identify the main gaps in this platform. Methods: a scoping review was conducted according to the PRISMA-ScR method to identify papers on surgery, and other surgical specialties, that used the DATASUS platform as a primary data source. No restrictions were imposed regarding the type of study or year of publication. Grounded Theory was used to analyze the content of the articles. Results: 248 works were initially analyzed and 47 were included in the final analysis of this study. The original articles included were published between 2009 and 2022 and the majority (12.76%, n=6) were published in the Journal of the Brazilian College of Surgeons. Retrospective studies (40.43%, n=19) were the most common type of study found. Content analysis of the articles identified four predominant domains in the scientific literature about the limitations of using DATASUS in surgical research: lack of data, reliability, precision and data integration. Conclusion: the information systems available in DATASUS are the largest source of information about the SUS, but the scientific literature on the quality of data available in these systems remains scarce and studies aimed at measuring this metric are necessary.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Surgery

Reference59 articles.

1. Possibilidades e limitações de uso das bases de dados do DATASUS no controle externo de políticas públicas de saúde no Brasil [dissertation on the Internet];Barbosa MC,2018

2. Indicadores Básicos de la Salud en Brasil: conceptos y aplicaciones,2008

3. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Guia de Vigilância Epidemiológica,2005

4. Cobertura de plano de saúde no Brasil análise dos dados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013 e 2019. Ciênc;De Souza Júnior PRB;Saúde Colet,2021

5. Bellwether Procedures for Monitoring Subnational Variation of All-cause Perioperative Mortality in Brazil;Truche P;WJS,2020

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3