Affiliation:
1. Università di Pisa, Italy
Abstract
Abstract Until the Amazonian rubber boom, cane sugar and coffee were the two most important export commodities for Brazil during the nineteenth century. Despite inherent differences in methods of cultivation, both sugar and coffee at once benefitted and suffered from the characteristics of Brazil’s factor endowment in land, labour and capital. Yet these two export commodities demonstrated divergent growth patterns across the nineteenth century. The difference was not one of relative productivity and thus price competitiveness disadvantage, but of the imperfectly competitive nature of the international market for each commodity. European governments actively practised strategic trade policy to transfer profits from foreign to domestic or colonial firms. These market distortions were exogenous, imposed by consumer markets, and took the form of European colonial tariff preferences and subsidies to domestic production. Coffee suffered less from imperfect competition, thus remaining more profitable to Brazilian agricultural producers in the long run.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference62 articles.
1. “The rise of coffee in the Brazilian south-east: tariffs and foreign market potential, 1827-40,”;Absell Christopher David;Economic History Review,2020
2. “Brazilian export growth and divergence in the tropics during the nineteenth century,”;Absell Christopher David;Journal of Latin American Studies,2016
3. “Reciprocity, non-discrimination and preferential agreements in the multilateral trading system,”;Bagwell Kyle;European Journal of Political Economy,2001
4. “Persistence and Decline: Slave Labour and Sugar Production in the Bahian Reconcavo, 1850-1888,”;Barickman B. J;Journal of Latin American Studies,1996
5. A Bahian Counterpoint: Sugar, Tobacco, Cassava, and Slavery in the Recôncavo, 1780-1860.;Barickman B. J,1998
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献