Affiliation:
1. Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
2. Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Brazil
Abstract
Abstract: In the field of family therapy (FT), theoretical and methodological perspectives coexist. This article aims to comprehend how family therapists use different theories, especially social constructionism. We describe a qualitative study, carried out through semi-structured and individual interviews with 14 Brazilian family therapists, men and women. Our analysis and discussion present four types of discourse by which the participants combine theoretical perspectives: conciliatory-constructionist, conciliatory-reflexive, conciliatory-descriptive and eclectic. The analysis presents features that characterize and differentiate each discourse, and implications they have on the participants’ practice. We conclude that the combination of theories is an effort to enhance clinical practice, at the same time as it creates tensions in the FT field. This article invites family therapists to construct practices based on an epistemological investigation, by which they will be able to identify theoretical premises that guide their actions, as an effort to achieve congruence between practices and the theories behind them.
Subject
General Psychology,Education
Reference32 articles.
1. The reflecting team: Dialogues and dialogues about dialogues;Andersen T.,1991
2. The new language of change: Constructive collaboration in psychotherapy;Andersen T.,1993
3. Collaborative relationships and dialogic conversations: Ideas for a relationally responsive practice;Anderson H.;Family Process,2012
4. Collaborative Inquiry: A postmodern approach to organizational consultation;Anderson H.
5. Putting the “family” back into family therapy;Breunlin D.;Family Process,2014
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献