Affiliation:
1. Dow AgroSciences Industrial Ltda, Brazil
2. Universidade Estadual Paulista “ Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Brazil
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of different weed management through a burndown application followed by sequential applications of herbicides to control Conyza spp. Thus, four field experiments were conducted, two in the western region of Paraná state (E1 and E2), one in Jataí, Goiás state (E3) and another one in Ibirubá, Rio Grande do Sul state (E4). Conyza spp. in this area had a height ranging between 25 and 60 cm. Treatments were arranged in a randomized block design with four replications. The primary herbicide treatments were 2,4-D + glyphosate + diclosulam, chlorimuron-ethyl + glyphosate + 2,4-D, and four doses of diclosulam + halauxifen-methyl + glyphosate. These treatments were applied singly or in sequential applications, made 10 days before the application of ammonium glufosinate, paraquat or saflufenacil. In all experiments, results showed efficient (90%) control of treatments containing diclosulam + halauxifen-methyl in combination with glyphosate on day 35 DAA, regardless of sequential applications. Applications of 2,4-D + glyphosate + diclosulam or chlorimuron-ethyl + glyphosate + 2,4-D were not effective against Conyza spp. at E1 and E2 locations, possibly due to the greater weed size (50 to 60 cm) at these sites. However, the same treatments were effective at E3 and E4 locations, where weeds were smaller. Diclosulam + halauxifen-methyl + glyphosate associated with ammonium glufosinate, paraquat or saflufenacil in sequential applications, proved to be an important tool to manage Conyza spp. at different growth stages.
Subject
Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science,Physiology,Biochemistry
Reference25 articles.
1. ArylexTM mode and site of action characterization. Weed Science Society of America and Canadian Weed Science Society/Société Canadienne de Malherbologie;;Bell J.L.,2014
2. Controle de biótipos resistentes de Conyza bonariensis com glyphosate+ clorimuron-etílico em função do estádio de desenvolvimento;Bressanin F.N.;Rev Bras Herb,2014
3. Estimativa do período que antecede a interferência de plantas daninhas na cultura da soja, var. Coodetec 202, por meio de testemunhas duplas;Constantin J.;Planta Daninha,2007
4. Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance halauxifen-methyl (XDE-729 methyl),2015
5. Benefits of soil-applied herbicides in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max);Ellis J.M.;Weed Technol,2002
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献