Resisting privatization and marketization of health care: People’s Health Movement’s experiences from India, Philippines and Europe

Author:

Nandi Sulakshana1ORCID,Vračar Ana2ORCID,Pachauli Chhaya3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Jan Swasthya Abhiyan, India; People’s Health Movement Global, India

2. People’s Health Movement Global, India; People’s Health Movement Europe, India

3. People’s Health Movement Global, India; Prayas Centre for Health Equity

Abstract

ABSTRACT For the last three decades, healthcare systems have been under pressure to adapt to a neoliberal world and incorporate market principles. The introduction of market-based instruments, increasing competition among health care providers, introducing publicly -funded private sector provisioning of healthcare through health insurance financing systems to replace public provisioning of health care, promoting individual responsibility for health and finally, the introduction of market relations through privatization, deregulation and decentralization of health care have been some common elements seen globally. These reforms, undertaken under the guise of increasing efficiency and quality through competition and choice, have in fact harmed the physical, emotional and mental health of communities around the world and also contributed to a significant rise in inequities in health and healthcare access. They have weakened the public healthcare systems of countries and led to commercialization of healthcare. This article presents three case studies of resistance, to the commercialization of health care, by the People’s Health Movement (PHM) and associated networks. It aims to contribute to the understanding of the way neoliberal reforms, including those imposed under structural adjustment programmes and some promoted under the Universal Health Coverage (UHC) paradigm, have impacted country-level health systems and access of people to health care, and bring out lessons from the resistance against these reforms.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Reference48 articles.

1. Neoliberalism as a class ideology; or, the political causes of the growth of inequalities;Navarro V;Int. J. Health Serv.,2007

2. The struggle for health: an emancipatory approach in the era of neoliberal globalization;Sengupta A,2018

3. Why public health care is better;Steendam J,2019

4. Neoliberalism, austerity and the Health and Social Care Act 2012;Pownall H;Ind. Law J.,2013

5. Socialist Register 2010: Morbid symptoms;Coburn D,2009

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3