Challenges in the methodological path of building the Institutional Accreditation process for SUS ombudpersons

Author:

Fernandes Fernando Manuel Bessa1ORCID,Siqueira Sandra Aparecida Venâncio de1ORCID,Motta José Inácio Jardim1ORCID,Wanzeler Murilo da Conceição Cunha2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Brasil

2. Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), Brasil

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper aims to reflect on the theoretical and practical challenges in the methodological path of building the Institutional Accreditation process of the Unified Health System (SUS) ombudspersons, developing teaching materials, and the dynamics of fundamental interactions between the stakeholders involved. It discusses the trajectory of a working partnership between a team of researchers and a department of the Ministry of Health, which aims to theoretically and methodologically support the actions of the sector working on the principal participation and social control topics and, in particular, the ombudspersons, generating evidence for management decision-making. The authors present the challenges in partnership and the process and discuss from a methodological, reflective, and participatory viewpoint, presenting ideas and concepts that have evolved and govern the pedagogical materials prepared for the instrumentalization of the Institutional Accreditation process of SUS ombudspersons as a theoretical-practical framework. The authors conclude that adopting a challenging constructivist method is a healthy effort for self-improvement and guarantee of the affirmation of democratic values, effective in the constant search for the qualification of the actions of the ombudspersons, research activity, management practice, and services and public policies.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference24 articles.

1. Nível de informação da população e utilização dos mecanismos institucionais de participação social em saúde em dois municípios do Nordeste do Brasil;Vazquez ML;Ciênc. Saúde Colet,2005

2. Desenho e funcionamento dos mecanismos de controle e accountability das agências reguladoras brasileiras: semelhanças e diferenças;Po MV;RAP,2006

3. Participação Social como método de governo? Um mapeamento das “Interfaces Socioestatais” nos programas federais: Efetividade das instituições participativas no Brasil;Pires R,2012

4. Atribuições de uma ouvidoria: opinião de usuários e funcionários;Peixoto SF;Saúde Soc,2013

5. Análise da atuação das ouvidorias estaduais do Sistema Único de Saúde como instâncias participativas;Fernandes FMB;Saúde debate,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3