Affiliation:
1. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Brasil
Abstract
ABSTRACT Debates in the British House of Commons between 1839 and 1946 revealed four distinct positions on the controversial Corn Laws. The Radicals, led by Richard Cobden, fought for overall free trade. The moderate Whigs, headed by Lord John Russell, leaned toward a fixed duty on imported corn. The Conservative Peelites, rallied behind Robert Peel, supported the prevailing sliding-scale system, while the landed Tories, who coalesced around Lord George Bentinck, wished protection all around. This article analyzes how the principles of political economy got entangled with political considerations in the speeches delivered by the leaders of each parliamentary faction. It concludes by highlighting the crucial role of political economy, especially the free trade doctrine, along with material evidence and historical precedent, as the key concurring factors in the repeal of the Corn Laws in 1846.
Reference65 articles.
1. The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain. V. I Industrialisation;ALLEN Robert C.,2008
2. The Tory Origin of Free Trade;ASHLEY William J.;The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1987
3. Voting Patterns in the British House of Commons in the 1840s;AYDELOTTE William O.;Comparative Studies in History and Society,1963
4. A History of the English Corn Laws from 1660-1846;BARNES Donald G.,1961
5. William Huskisson and Liberal Reform;BRADY Alexander.,1967