TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK

Published:2020-12 Issue:6 Volume:28 Page:296-302
ISSN:1809-4406
Container-title:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira
language:
Short-container-title:Acta ortop. bras.

Author:

SORPRESO RENATO SCAPUCIN¹^ORCID,MARTINS DÉLIO EULÁLIO²^ORCID,KANAS MICHEL²^ORCID,SORPRESO ISABEL CRISTINA ESPOSITO³^ORCID,ASTUR NELSON⁴^ORCID,WAJCHENBERG MARCELO²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil

2. Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Brazil

3. Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil

4. Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Brazil; Santa Casa de São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the postoperative outcomes of transforaminal intersomatic lumbar arthrodesis with structured iliac bone autograft and PEEK device. Methods: The total of 93 medical records of patients undergoing transforaminal intersomatic fusion between January 2012 and July 2017 with at least 1 year of postoperative follow-up, with complete medical record, containing clinical file and radiological exams, were reviewed. Results: From the medical records evaluated, 48 patients underwent the procedure with structured iliac autograft (group 1) and 45 with PEEK device (group 2). There was an improvement in functional capacity in both groups (p < 0.001), however there was no difference when comparing them (p = 0.591). Conclusion: The postoperative clinical and radiological results of lumbar arthrodesis with TLIF technique, using a structured iliac bone autograft compared to a PEEK device, were similar. Level of Evidence II, Retrospective study.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Link

http://www.scielo.br/pdf/aob/v28n6/1809-4406-aob-28-06-296.pdf

Reference38 articles.

1. Lumbar interbody fusion techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF;Mobbs RJ;J Spine Surg,2015

2. Epidemiology of spine care: the back pain dilemma;Friedly J;Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am,2010

3. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine part 7: lumbar fusion for intractable low-back pain without stenosis or spondylolisthesis;Eck JC;J Neurosurg Spine,2014

4. Transpedicular screw-rod fixation of the lumbar spine operative technique and outcome in 104 cases;Dickman CA;J Neurosurg,1992

5. Single-level lumbar spine fusion a comparison of anterior and posterior approaches;Pradhan BB;J Spinal Disord Tech,2002

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Interbody cages versus structural bone grafts in lumbar arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine;2024-05-01