Outpatient health service utilization and associated factors: a population-based study

Author:

Mendoza-Sassi Raúl1,Béria Jorge U2,Barros Aluísio J D3

Affiliation:

1. Fundação Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Brazil

2. Universidade Luterana do Brasil, Brazil

3. Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Brazil

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that lead people to visit a doctor in Brazil and assess differences between socioeconomic groups. METHODS: A cross-sectional study comprising 1,260 subjects aged 15 or more was carried out in southern Brazil. Demographic, socioeconomic, health needs and regular source of care data were analyzed concerning visits to a doctor within two months from the interview. Adjusted prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Poisson regression. RESULTS: Adjusted PR showed that women having stressful life events, health insurance, and a regular doctor increased the outcome. A dose-related response was found with self-reported health, and the probability of visiting a doctor increased with health needs. Analysis in the chronic disease group revealed that uneducated lower income subjects had a 62% reduction in the chance of visiting a doctor compared to uneducated higher income ones. However, as it was seen a significant interaction between income and education, years of schooling increased utilization in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest the existence of health inequity in the poorest group that could be overcome with education. Specific measures reinforcing the importance of having a regular doctor may also improve access in the underserved group.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference15 articles.

1. Health sector reform in Brazil: a case study of inequity;Almeida C;Int J Health Serv,2000

2. Why people consult a doctor?;Campbell SM;Fam Pract,1996

3. Utilização de serviços ambulatoriais em Pelotas: onde a população consulta e com que freqüência;Costa JD;Rev Saúde Pública,1997

4. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empircal comparison fo models that directly estimates the prevalence ratio;Hirakata VM,2000

5. Patterns of utilization, the patient perspective;Hulka BS;Med Care,1985

Cited by 76 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3