Affiliation:
1. University of Ponta Grossa
Abstract
The microhardness of a bleaching-shade resin composite polymerized with different light-curing units was evaluated. Composite samples (3M ESPE Filtek Supreme) were applied to brass rings (2 mm in thickness, 5 mm in diameter). Three commercial LED lights were used to polymerize the specimens and the results were compared to those of a conventional halogen light. The light sources used in the present study were: Demetron Optilux 401 (QTH), 3M ESPE Elipar FreeLight (LED 1); Kerr L.E.Demetron I (LED 2), and ColtoluxLED lights (LED 3). The microhardness of the top and bottom surfaces was assessed with a digital Vickers hardness-measuring instrument, under load. At the bottom surface, no significant difference among the light sources was observed (two-way ANOVA). At the top surface, the QTH light source presented significantly higher hardness values compared to the values observed when LED 1 and LED 3 were used. There were no significant differences between the QTH and LED 2 light sources. Significantly higher hardness values were also found at the top surface when compared to the values observed at the bottom surface. The power density of the polymerization light sources seemed to be responsible for the observed resin composite hardness, not their irradiance.
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Reference26 articles.
1. Kinetics of network formation during photopolymerization;Andrzejewska E.;Trans Acad Dent Mater,2004
2. Contraction stress related to degree of conversion and reaction kinetics;Braga RR;J Dent Res,2002
3. Light curing: an update;Burgess JO;Compend Contin Educ Dent,2002
4. Monomer conversion of pre-heated composite;Daronch M;J Dent Res,2005
5. The effect of curing light variations on bulk curing and wall-to-wall quality of two types and various shades of resin composites;Davidson-Kaban SS;Dent Mater,1997
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献