Abstract
Small, shallow estuaries can be highly vulnerable to land use changes, eutrophication and habitat loss but are understudied with respect to their larger counterparts. Where they are monitored, the descriptors of their environmental status are typically chlorophyll a as a proxy for phytoplankton abundance and nutrient concentration as a presumed driver of the phytoplankton community. We present data from a shallow estuary, Weeks Bay, Alabama (USA), that demonstrates that chlorophyll a and nutrient concentrations are inadequate descriptors of ecological state. Weeks Bay had relatively high nutrient concentrations (86–169µM total nitrogen and 1.0–5.2µM total phosphorus) and highly variable chlorophyll a concentrations (2.2–160.5μgL-1). The variability in chlorophyll a was most highly correlated with nutrient levels and river discharge. There was no relationship between chlorophyll a and community composition. Two of three maxima in chlorophyll a (> 100 μgL-1) were caused by non-toxic chlorophytes and diatoms; the third was dominated by potentially toxic raphidophyte Heterosigma akashiwo. The phytoplankton were diverse even at the class level and community composition varied on both annual and inter-annual scales. The best overall descriptor of phytoplankton composition was the annual cycle in temperature, but inter-annual variability was correlated with hydrology. In the winter, dominance by dinoflagellates, including several taxa that form harmful algal blooms, was correlated with low river discharge, low turbidity and high zooplankton numbers, while dominance by diatoms was correlated with high and variable river discharge and high turbidity. In the summer, dominance by cryptophytes versus diatoms was consistent with changes in groundwater discharge. The dominance of harmful algal bloom taxa vs non-toxic ones could not be inferred from chlorophyll a and/or nutrient concentrations.