Affiliation:
1. Bács-Kiskun Megyei Kórház Kecskemét Nyíri út 38. 6000
2. Uzsoki Utcai Kórház Budapest
3. Irinyi Szakrendelő Kecskemét
4. Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Általános Orvostudományi Kar Szent-Györgyi Albert Klinikai Központ, Patológiai Intézet Szeged
Abstract
Introduction: Gleason grading is the most common method of prostate cancer classification. Aim: The aim of the authors was to assess the reproducibility of Gleason grading among pathologists using the same needle biopsy samples. Method: 23 pathologists examined 37 prostate cancer biopsies stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Gleason scores were categorised into 4 groups (2–4, 5–6, 7 and 8–10). Kappa statistics were used to reflect interobserver agreement. Results: Considering all participating pathologists, grouping into one of the 4 categories resulted in an overall kappa value of 0.49. For the individual categories, the worst agreement (kappa = 0.15) was seen with well differentiated carcinomas, and the best (kappa = 0.65) with poorly differentiated ones. Conclusions: These results suggest that Gleason grading in biopsy samples is moderately reproducible. The kappa values vary according to the differentiation of the cancer, and there is not much difference between the results of the present study and those published in the literature. To increase reproducibility, trainings should be organised, and this could improve the quality of grading. Orv. Hetil., 2013, 154, 1219–1225.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献