Development, psychometric validation, and cross-cultural comparison of the “Instagram Motives Questionnaire” (IMQ) and the “Instagram Uses and Patterns Questionnaire” (IUPQ)

Author:

Romero Saletti Silvana Melissa1ORCID,Van den Broucke Stephan1ORCID,Billieux Joël2ORCID,Karila Laurent3ORCID,Kuss Daria J.4ORCID,Rivera Espejo José Manuel5ORCID,Sheldon Pavica6ORCID,Lang Cathryne P.7ORCID,Zimmer-Gembeck Melanie J.8ORCID,Zollo Palmyra1,Courboin Clara1,Diez Dominica9ORCID,Madison T. Phillip10ORCID,Ramos-Diaz Jano11ORCID,Eguia Elias César Augusto12ORCID,Otiniano Fiorella13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

2. Institut de Psychologie, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Suisse

3. Centre d’Enseignement, de Recherche et de Traitement des Addictions, Hôpital Universitaire Paul Brousse (AP-HP), Université Paris Saclay, UR PSYCOMADD, Villejuif, France

4. Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK

5. University of Antwerp, Belgium

6. University of South Alabama, Alabama, USA

7. Griffith University, Australia

8. Griffith University and Menzies Health Institute of Queensland, Australia

9. ALTHAIA, Red Asistencial Universitaria de Manresa, Spain

10. University of Louisiana at Lafayette, USA

11. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima, Perú

12. Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Perú

13. Universidad del Pacífico, Lima, Perú

Abstract

AbstractBackground and aimsSocial network use is widespread, and the study of Instagram seems to have captured more attention in recent years. However, scale development and validation in the field has fallen short of providing sound scales of Instagram motives and usage patterns that consider the uniqueness of Instagram-related behavior. This paper describes the development, psychometric and cross-cultural validation of two new measurement instruments: the “Instagram Motives Questionnaire” (IMQ) and the “Instagram Uses and Patterns Questionnaire” (IUPQ).Methods and resultsA preliminary set of items was developed for each questionnaire based on a previous qualitative interview study on Instagram motives, uses, and consequences. In the first study, the questionnaires were distributed to a sample of 312 participants aged 18–35 years (M = 23.81; SD = 4.49), and an exploratory factor analysis was performed. A parsimonious and interpretable 6-factor solution that displayed adequate factor loadings and adequate Omega coefficients for both instruments were found. In a second study, the two instruments and other measures of known social network usage correlates and mental health consequences were administered online to 1,418 English-speaking participants aged 18–34 years (M = 21.35; SD = 3.89). Both scales showed good psychometric properties and the factor structure identified in study 1 was reproduced through confirmatory factor analysis. Omega reliability coefficients were adequate. Finally, when performing multi-group CFA along with a French (n = 1,826) and a Spanish (n = 3,040) sample, language and gender invariance were supported. Correlations with other relevant measures indicate good convergent validity of both scales.ConclusionsThe present research provides psychometrically sound instruments for further investigations on Instagram use behaviors.

Funder

Conseil de l’Action Internationale of the Université catholique de Louvain

Publisher

Akademiai Kiado Zrt.

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,General Medicine,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference159 articles.

1. Social media and depression symptoms: A network perspective;Aalbers, G.,2019

2. Fear of missing out (FoMO) and internet use: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis;Akbari, M.,2021

3. A tale of four platforms: Motivations and uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students?;Alhabash, S.,2017

4. Development and validation of social anxiety scale for social media users;Alkis, Y.,2017

5. Irresistible: The rise of addictive technology and the business of keeping us hooked;Alter, A.,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3