Inflation measurement in times of large consumption shifts – Evidence of the CPI bias from Poland

Author:

Hałka Aleksandra1,Leszczyńska-Paczesna Agnieszka2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Narodowy Bank Polski, Warsaw, Poland

2. Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodz, Rewolucji 1905 r. 41, 90-214 Lodz, Poland

Abstract

AbstractThe paper addresses the problem of inflation measurement and the way it is affected by the choice of CPI weights. We focus on the bias resulting from using weights reflecting the past structure of consumption and the choice of the plutocratic index. The study is based on a comparison of the official consumer price index in Poland with superlative indices. Contrary to most literature, our findings indicate an understatement of the CPI. Additionally, in 2020 due to large changes in the pattern of household consumption, the underestimation increased. This results from the increase in the expenditure on the relatively more expensive goods which could not be accounted for in real time. In general, the lack of overstatement in the Polish CPI may result from frequent adjustments in the weights used for the calculation of CPI and a faster-than-CPI rise in the prices of those goods and services for which demand is relatively inelastic. Additionally, we deliver the estimates of the plutocratic gap, which indicates that the use of the plutocratic weights in the calculation of CPI leads to a lower price index than its democratic equivalent.

Publisher

Akademiai Kiado Zrt.

Subject

Economics and Econometrics

Reference45 articles.

1. Morgenstern's Forgotten Contribution: A Stab to the Heart of Modern Economics;Bagus, P.,2011

2. Problem optymalnej stopy inflacji w modelowaniu wzrostu gospodarczego (The Problem of Optimal Inflation Rate in Economic Growth Modelling);Baranowski, P.,2008

3. Consumer Price Index Measurement Bias;Białek, J.,2014

4. Toward a More Accurate Measure of the Cost of Living;Boskin, M. J.,1996

5. Observations in a Hostile Environment: Morgenstern on the Accuracy of Economic Observations;Boumans, M.,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3