Affiliation:
1. Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada
Abstract
AbstractThis article accounts for the traditionally-labelled Level 1/Level 2 affix distinction in English by combining the predictions of floating segmental structure (e.g. Rubach 1996) and cyclic spell-out by phase (Chomsky 1999; Marantz 2007). It offers insight not only into the different phonological patterns these affixes trigger, but importantly, explains when the same affix will trigger distinct phonological patterns (when an affix behaves sometimes as Level 1 and sometimes as Level 2). It is argued that Level 1 affixes are distinguished by an initial floating vowel in their underlying representations, and that if we combine this with the proposal that affixes that merge directly to roots are interpreted in the same phonological cycle as these roots then we can remove the reference to diacritic notions such as Level 1 and Level 2 from the grammar. This then allows for a fully modular account of English affix classes, where the phonological derivation refers solely to phonological representations.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Cultural Studies
Reference240 articles.
1. Lexical Strata in English
2. La liaison et l'illusion;Laks;Langages,2005
3. In defence of underlying representations: Latin rhotacism, French liaison, Romanian palatalization;Bermúdez-Otero;To appear in Probus,2018a
4. Some phonological rules of Yidiny;Dixon;Linguistic Inquiry,1977
5. From speech perception to morphology: Affix ordering revisited;Hay;Language 78,2002
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献