AI and international law – Legal personality and avenues for regulation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

AI and international law – Legal personality and avenues for regulation

Published:2022-09-13 Issue:4 Volume:62 Page:320-344
ISSN:2498-5473
Container-title:Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies
language:
Short-container-title:HJLS

Author:

Hárs András¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of International Law, Faculty of Public Governance and International Studies, Ludovika University of Public Service, Budapest, Hungary

Abstract

Abstract The development of AI has been an explosive process, permeating almost all areas of life. During this rapid evolution, the legal profession has been slow to catch up. This is especially true for international law, which seemingly remains indecisive regarding whether it has a role to play at all. This article aims at mapping out converging points between AI and international law. Through separating key elements of the definition and nature of AI, the possibility of its legal personality and the means by which AI may become a subject of international law are analysed. Utilizing various modalities regarding legal personality, such as that of inanimate objects, corporations and natural persons, the paper presents avenues for if and when decision-makers want to regulate the field. Last, the advantages and problems with bestowing legal personality and the potential future directions of international regulation are observed.

Funder

National Research Development and Innovation Fund

Thematic Area Excellence Program 2020

Publisher

Akademiai Kiado Zrt.

Subject

Law

Link

https://akjournals.com/downloadpdf/journals/2052/62/4/article-p320.xml

Reference73 articles.

1. Convention (No. 169) concerning indigenous and tribal peoples in independent countries, Geneva, 27 June 1989, UNTS 28383.

2. European Commission – Expert Group on Liability and New Technologies – New Technologies Formation, Liability for artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies (2019).

3. European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 with recommendations to the Commission on a civil liability regime for artificial intelligence, 2020/2014, accessed 9 February 2022.

4. European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 on intellectual property rights for the development of artificial intelligence technologies, 2020/2015, accessed 9 February 2022.

5. European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 with recommendations to the Commission on a framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, 2020/2012, accessed 9 February 2022.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. AI Governance in a Complex and Rapidly Changing Regulatory Landscape: A Global Perspective;Humanities and Social Sciences Communications;2024-09-01

2. From the Theory of the African Origin of Humankind to Modern Social, Legal and Technological Innovations: a Brief Analytical Excursion into Anthroposociogenesis;Journal of Digital Technologies and Law;2024-07-31

3. ULUSLARARASI YAKLAŞIMLA YAPAY ZEKÂ VE YAPAY ZEKÂ MARİFETİYLE DELİLLERE ERİŞİM;Kırıkkale Hukuk Mecmuası;2024-07-19

4. Yapay Zekâ ve Uluslararası Hukukun Geleceği;Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi;2023-12-18

5. Artificial intelligence in the work process. A reflection on the proposed European Union regulations on artificial intelligence from an occupational health and safety perspective;Computer Law & Security Review;2023-07