Conclusion: recommendations and findings of the RED SEED working group-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Conclusion: recommendations and findings of the RED SEED working group

Published:2016 Issue:1 Volume:426 Page:567-648
ISSN:0305-8719
Container-title:Geological Society, London, Special Publications
language:en
Short-container-title:Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Author:

Harris A. J. L.¹,Carn S.²,Dehn J.³,Del Negro C.⁴,Guđmundsson M. T.⁵,Cordonnier B.⁶,Barnie T.¹,Chahi E.⁷,Calvari S.⁴,Catry T.⁸,de Groeve T.⁹,Coppola D.¹⁰,Davies A.¹¹,Favalli M.¹²,Ferrucci F.¹³,Fujita E.¹⁴,Ganci G.⁴,Garel F.¹⁵,Huet P.¹⁶,Kauahikaua J.¹⁷,Kelfoun K.¹,Lombardo V.¹⁸,Macedonio G.¹⁹,Pacheco J.²⁰,Patrick M.¹⁷,Pergola N.²¹,Ramsey M.²²,Rongo R.²³,Sahy F.⁷,Smith K.²⁴,Tarquini S.¹²,Thordarson T.⁵,Villeneuve N.²⁵,Webley P.³,Wright R.²⁶,Zakšek K.²⁵

Affiliation:

1. Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans, Université Blaise Pascal – CNRS – IRD, OPGC, 5 rue Kessler, 63038 Clermont Ferrand, France

2. Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931, USA

3. University of Alaska Fairbanks, Geophysical Institute, 903 Koyukuk Drive, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA

4. Instituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia – Osservatorio Etneo INGV, Sezione di Catania, Piazza Roma 2, 95125 Catania, Italy

5. University of Iceland, Institute of Earth Sciences, Sturlugata 7, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland

6. Gentleman Scientist

7. Game Developers, 5 rue des martins pecheurs, 34000 Montpellier, France

8. SEAS-OI, UMR 228 Espace-Dev (UM2, IRD, UAG, UR), 40 Avenue de Soweto, CS 70561, 97447 Saint-Pierre cedex, Reunion, France

9. Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen, European Commission – Joint Research Centre, Via E. Fermi, I-21027 Ispra (VA), Italy

10. Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Torino, Via Valperga Caluso, 35-10125 Torino, Italy

11. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA

12. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione di Pisa Via della Faggiola 32, 56126 Pisa, Italy

13. Deptartment of Environment, Earth and Ecosystems, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK; Deptartment of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, University of Calabria, Ponte Bucci 44A, 87036 Rende (CS), Italy

14. National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, Tennodai 3-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0006, Japan

15. Géosciences Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France

16. La Cité du Volcan, RN3 - Bourg Murat, Le Tampon, La Réunion, France

17. United States Geological Survey, Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, PO Box 22, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718, USA

18. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Centro Nazionale Terremoti, Via di Vigna Murata, 605, 00143 Rome, Italy

19. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Osservatorio Vesuviano, Via Diocleziano, 328, 80124 Napoli, Italy

20. Centro de Vulcanologia e Avaliação de Riscos Geológicos, Universidade dos Açores – Edifício do Complexo Científico, 3° Piso, Ala Sul 9501-801 Ponta Delgada, Potugal

21. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Metodologie per l'Analisi Abientale C. da S. Loja, Zona Industriale, 85050 Tito Scalo (Pz), Italy

22. Department of Geology and Planetary Science, University of Pittsburgh, 4107 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA

23. Department of Biology, Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Calabria, Arcavacata, 87036 – Rende (CS), Italy

24. Laboratoire GéoSciences Réunion, 15, Avenue René Cassin, BP 7151 97715 Saint Denis messagerie cedex 9, La Réunion, France

25. University of Hamburg, Institute of Geophysics, Bundesstr. 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany

26. Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1680 East West Road, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA

Abstract

AbstractRED SEED stands for Risk Evaluation, Detection and Simulation during Effusive Eruption Disasters, and combines stakeholders from the remote sensing, modelling and response communities with experience in tracking volcanic effusive events. The group first met during a three day-long workshop held in Clermont Ferrand (France) between 28 and 30 May 2013. During each day, presentations were given reviewing the state of the art in terms of (a) volcano hot spot detection and parameterization, (b) operational satellite-based hot spot detection systems, (c) lava flow modelling and (d) response protocols during effusive crises. At the end of each presentation set, the four groups retreated to discuss and report on requirements for a truly integrated and operational response that satisfactorily combines remote sensors, modellers and responders during an effusive crisis. The results of collating the final reports, and follow-up discussions that have been on-going since the workshop, are given here. We can reduce our discussions to four main findings. (1) Hot spot detection tools are operational and capable of providing effusive eruption onset notice within 15 min. (2) Spectral radiance metrics can also be provided with high degrees of confidence. However, if we are to achieve a truly global system, more local receiving stations need to be installed with hot spot detection and data processing modules running on-site and in real time. (3) Models are operational, but need real-time input of reliable time-averaged discharge rate data and regular updates of digital elevation models if they are to be effective; the latter can be provided by the radar/photogrammetry community. (4) Information needs to be provided in an agreed and standard format following an ensemble approach and using models that have been validated and recognized as trustworthy by the responding authorities. All of this requires a sophisticated and centralized data collection, distribution and reporting hub that is based on a philosophy of joint ownership and mutual trust. While the next chapter carries out an exercise to explore the viability of the last point, the detailed recommendations behind these findings are detailed here.

Publisher

Geological Society of London

Subject

Geology,Ocean Engineering,Water Science and Technology

Reference354 articles.

1. ABC News. 2014. Drone takes golden retriever for a walk (yes, really), 23 May 2014, http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2014/05/drone-takes-golden-retriever-for-a-walk-yes-really/

2. Andredakis I. & De Groove T. 2015. Towards a global humanitarian volcano impact alert model integrated in a multi-hazard system. In: Harris A.J.L. , De Groeve T. , Garel F. & Carn S.A. (eds) Detecting, Modelling and Responding to Effusive Eruptions. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 426. First published online June 10, 2015, http://doi.org/10.1144/SP426.10

3. Remote infrared detection of the cessation of volcanic eruptions

4. Bailey J.E. , Dean K. , Dehn J. & Webley P. 2010. Integrated satellite observations of the 2006. eruption of Augustine Volcano. In: Power J.A. , Coombs M.L. & Freymueller J.T. (eds) The 2006 Eruption of Augustine Volcano. US Geological Survey, Alaska, Professional Papers, 1769.

5. Factors affecting the accuracy of thermal imaging cameras in volcanology

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Attempt to Model Lava Flow Faster Than Real Time: An Example of La Palma Using VolcFlow;GeoHazards;2022-12-10

2. Evaluating lava flow propagation models with a case study from the 2018 eruption of Kīlauea Volcano, Hawai'i;Bulletin of Volcanology;2021-10-05

3. Thermal Remote Sensing for Global Volcano Monitoring: Experiences From the MIROVA System;Frontiers in Earth Science;2020-01-27

4. Monitoring the time-averaged discharge rates, volumes and emplacement style of large lava flows by using MIROVA system: the case of the 2014-2015 eruption at Holuhraun (Iceland);Annals of Geophysics;2019-01-30

5. Modeling lava flow propagation over a flat landscape by using MrLavaLoba: the case of the 2014–2015 eruption at Holuhraun, Iceland;Annals of Geophysics;2018-10-17