Substructures, underground space and sustainable urban environments

Author:

Rogers C. D. F.1

Affiliation:

1. Professor of Geotechnical Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK (e-mail: c.d.f.rogers@bham.ac.uk)

Abstract

AbstractThis paper examines the International Association for Engineering Geology and the Environment's 10th Congress theme of ‘Engineering Geology for Tomorrow's Cities’, with specific reference to substructures and underground space, by exploring the possibilities of, and barriers to, increased underground space usage. It is vital that some degree of envisioning of the future should be attempted and this means looking backwards to help in extrapolating forwards. Such an exercise must be undertaken in the context of sustainability and, thus, an approach encompassing economic, social and environmental issues is warranted. Using a ‘three-pillar’ approach as the basis on which various alternative futures might be envisioned is helpful and very rapidly shows that current thinking in relation to designs is typically very narrow indeed. Three scenarios are examined to explore how we treat the interaction between substructures and the ground and, thus, what we might need to allow for in designs at different depths. Although acknowledging that different countries have different geological conditions to help or hinder them, examples are drawn from Norway to demonstrate how sustainable underground concepts have been put into place to very great effect over the past 80 years or so. Each example introduces different benefits and shows how designs have progressively improved. In exploring how underground space might be better used, the ground needs to be viewed as a resource for which sustainable practices, such as industrial symbiosis, apply. The many advances in monitoring technology also need to be taken advantage of, so that the uncertainty of performance of hidden elements does not present a barrier. In addition, the uncertainty in what is already present needs to be removed. Recent developments in 3D shallow subsurface soil and made-ground mapping, accompanied by the development of techniques to map the buried infrastructure, are shown to provide an important way forward in the UK.

Publisher

Geological Society of London

Subject

Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Reference42 articles.

1. Anonymous (1901a) Scientific America, Some features of the New York Rapid Transit Tunnel. 25 May, p 327.

2. Anonymous (1901b) Scientific America, Pipe galleries for the Rapid Transit Subway. 25 May, p 322.

3. ASCE (2002) Standard guidelines for the collection and depiction of existing subsurface utility data (ASCE 38-02. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA).

4. Why did the hydropower industry go underground?;Broch,2006

5. Brundtland G. H. (1987) Our Common Future (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3