On the stratigraphical and palaeobiogeographical significance of Borelis melo melo (Fichtel & Moll, 1798) and B. melo curdica (Reichel, 1937) (Foraminifera, Miliolida, Alveolinidae)-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

On the stratigraphical and palaeobiogeographical significance of Borelis melo melo (Fichtel & Moll, 1798) and B. melo curdica (Reichel, 1937) (Foraminifera, Miliolida, Alveolinidae)

Published:2006-11-01 Issue:2 Volume:25 Page:175-185
ISSN:2041-4978
Container-title:Journal of Micropalaeontology
language:en
Short-container-title:J. Micropalaeontol.

Author:

Jones Robert W.,Simmons Michael D.,Whittaker John E.

Abstract

Abstract. The stratigraphical and palaeobiogeographical significance of Borelis melo melo (Fichtel & Moll, 1798) and B. melo curdica (Reichel, 1937) is re-assessed in the light of a taxonomic review. Borelis melo melo ranges at least throughout the Miocene, whereas B. melo curdica is restricted to the late Early to Middle Miocene. Both sub-species occur only in the Indo-Pacific Province in the late Early Miocene (‘early’ Burdigalian), but in both the Indo-Pacific and Mediterranean provinces in the latest Early–early Middle Miocene (‘middle’ Burdigalian–Langhian), implying a marine (re-)connection between the two regions at this time.

Publisher

Copernicus GmbH

Subject

Paleontology

Link

https://jm.copernicus.org/articles/25/175/2006/jm-25-175-2006.pdf

Reference84 articles.

1. C. G., Adams: Tertiary foraminifera in the Tethyan, American and Indo-Pacific provinces, Systematics Association Publications, 7, 195-217, 1967.

2. C. G., Adams: A reconsideration of the East Indian Letter Classification of the Tertiary, Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology Series, 19, 87-137, 1970.

3. C. G., Adams, A. W., Gentry and P. J., Whybrow: Dating the Terminal Eocene Event, Utrecht Micropalaeontological Bulletins, 30, 273-298, 1983.

4. C. G., Adams, D. D., Bayliss and J. E., Whittaker: The Terminal Tethyan Event: A critical review of the conflicting age determinations for the disconnection of the Mediterranean from the Indian OceanIn: (Eds), Fossil Vertebrates of ArabiaYale University Press, New Haven & London, 477–484., 1999.

5. T. D., Adams: The Asmari Formation of Lurestan and Khuzestan ProvincesIranian Oil Operating Company Geological and Exploration Division Report (No1154)., 1969.

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Foraminiferal distribution and biostratigraphy of the Lower Miocene Qom formation, north of Bijar, NW Iran;Revue de Micropaléontologie;2023-12

2. The importance of foraminifera in providing paleoecologic and biostratigraphic information for a Miocene tropical carbonate system: Cicuco Field, NW Colombia;Stratigraphy & Timescales;2023

3. Facies analysis and sequence stratigraphy of the Middle Miocene Marmarica Formation at Siwa area, north Western Desert, Egypt;Geological Journal;2022-03-16

4. Sequence stratigraphy of the Miocene siliciclastic–carbonate sediments in Sadat Area, north‐west of Gulf of Suez: Implications for Miocene eustasy;Geological Journal;2022-02-03

5. Age determination and evolution of the paleoenvironmental conditions of Oligocene-Miocene sediments (Qom Formation) in the Qom Back-Arc Basin (northern margin of Neotethys), Central Iran;Arabian Journal of Geosciences;2022-01