Affiliation:
1. Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
2. Aker BP, Stavanger, Norway
Abstract
Distribution of the Triassic succession in the North Sea is poorly understood because of structural complexities associated with halokinesis and limited stratigraphic control. This study uses a seismic and well-based dataset to improve understanding of development of the Triassic succession in the Ula Field Area, in the Norwegian North Sea.
Core interpretation revealed a fluvial-dominated depositional environment in the Ula Field Area. Palynological studies allowed dating of cored intervals, revealing Ladinian and Carnian sections, time-equivalent to the Julius and Joanne members of the Skagerrak Formation. Well-log interpretation provided insight into the intra-Triassic stratigraphy of the Ula Field Area. A section considered to be equivalent to and extending from the Smith Bank Formation to the Jonathan Member of the Skagerrak Formation was interpreted and correlated across the area. In the proposed correlation, the Julius Member thins towards the Ula Field Area and is replaced by a time equivalent sandstone unit. The Jonathan Member displays a sandier composition compared to the equivalent section in the UK sector. Seismic facies-based interpretation of Triassic stratigraphy within salt minibasins allowed recognition and mapping of intra-Triassic units and showed that mudstone members thin towards the NE. Interpreted internal geometries within minibasins allowed determination of the timing of halokinesis. Integration of different datasets allowed palaeogeographic reconstructions for the Anisian, early Ladinian, Carnian and Norian to be constructed. To conclude, the distribution of stacked fluvial channel deposits indicates that they occur both within minibasins and across salt highs such that ongoing halokinesis had no topographic expression and that channels were free to migrate across the area.
Publisher
Geological Society of London
Reference70 articles.
1. Chapter 2 Palustrine Carbonates
2. Archer S. Ward S. Menad S. Shahim I. Grant N. Sloan H. and Cole A. 2010. The Jasmine discovery central North Sea UKCS. In: Vining B.A. and Pickering S.C. (eds) Petroleum Geology: From Mature Basins to New Frontiers – Proceedings of the 7th Petroleum Geology. Geological Society London 225–243 https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2017.40
3. Triassic mudstones of the Central North Sea: cross-border characterization, correlation and their palaeoclimatic significance
4. Bachmann, G.H., Geluk, M.C. et al. 2010. Triassic. In: Doornenbal, J.C. and Stevenson, A.G. (eds) Petroleum Geological Atlas of the Southern Permian Basin Area. EAGE Publications B.V., Houten, 149–173.
5. Controls on fluvial sedimentary architecture and sediment-fill state in salt-walled mini-basins: Triassic Moenkopi Formation, Salt Anticline Region, SE Utah, USA