Affiliation:
1. Harbour Energy plc, Rubislaw House, Anderson Drive, Aberdeen AB15 6FZ, UK
Abstract
Drilling infill wells into a heavily depleted reservoir poses several challenges that can lead to increased time, cost and risk. Data acquisition, including gathering formation pressure data, can be severely compromised, complicating real-time decisions and pore pressure interpretation. Fracture gradients, usually constrained by data acquired outside the reservoir, need to be estimated using a different approach through a depleted reservoir. The Jasmine high-pressure high-temperature (HPHT) field in the UK Central North Sea can be used to illustrate some of these challenges and to describe some practical solutions. A qualitative approach to estimating the level of reservoir depletion from formation gas measurements has been developed for the Jasmine Field, comparing pre-depletion gas trends against those obtained during the infill drilling campaign. The methods described here to estimate depleted fracture gradients using modelled and observed stress paths coupled to the pore pressure reduction were found to fit with well observations, and have helped to inform operational decisions to manage severe lost circulation events. A strategy to acquire data in memory while drilling has proved successful and has allowed lost circulation events to be managed safely. Managed pressure drilling has opened up narrow drilling windows, and has reduced the number of hole sizes and liners required to drill these infill wells.
Thematic collection:
This article is part of the Geopressure collection available at:
https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/geopressure
Publisher
Geological Society of London
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Economic Geology,Geochemistry and Petrology,Geology,Fuel Technology
Reference8 articles.
1. Chan A.W. and Zoback M.D. 2002. Deformation analysis in reservoir space (DARS): a simple formalism for prediction of reservoir deformation with depletion. Paper SPE-78174-MS presented at the SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics Conference 20–23 October 2002 Irving Texas USA https://doi.org/10.2118/78174-MS
2. Franquet, J.A. and Abass, H.H. 1999. Experimental evaluation of Biot's poroelastic parameter – three different methods. In: Amadei, B., Kranz, R.L., Scott, G.A. and Smeallie, P.H. (eds) Rock Mechanics for Industry. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 349–355.
3. Gaarenstroom L. Tromp R.A.J. De Jong M.C. and Brandenburg A.M. 1993. Overpressures in the Central North Sea: implications for trap integrity and drilling safety. Geological Society London Petroleum Geology Conference Series 4 1305–1313 https://doi.org/10.1144/0041305
4. Kamal B. Saboor A. MacFarlane G. and Kernche F. 2021. Significant performance improvement with MPD in HPHT narrow drilling window campaign in the North Sea. Paper OTC-31217-MS presented at the Offshore Technology Conference 16–19 August 2021 Virtual and Houston Texas USA https://doi.org/10.4043/31217-MS
5. Lahann R.W. and Swarbrick R.E. 2017. An improved procedure for pre-drill calculation of fracture pressure. Geological Society London Special Publications 458 213–225 https://doi.org/10.1144/SP458.13
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献