Affiliation:
1. Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RH, UK
Abstract
AbstractThis paper summarizes debates, among European geologists in the early nineteenth century, about the possible equivalence (or non-equivalence) between the biblical account of Noah's Flood, and new and cumulative evidence for an exceptional watery catastrophe or ‘geological deluge’ in very recent Earth history. The ‘diluvial theory’ deserves to be taken seriously as an attempted explanation of some extremely puzzling physical features (many of them reinterpreted later as traces of a glacial ‘catastrophe’ or Ice Age). The ‘geological deluge’ was eventually recognized as having been far earlier in Earth history than any event recorded by literate human societies. Among geologists, although not always among the wider public, this gradual dissociation between biblical Flood and geological deluge was generally amicable, not acrimonious. It was facilitated by the concurrent development of biblical scholarship, which showed that earlier literalistic interpretations were no longer tenable (and were also destructive of religious meaning). What was transposed into geology in the course of these debates was the strong Judaeo-Christian sense that the world has had a directional and contingent history, which might have been punctuated by occasional catastrophic events.
Publisher
Geological Society of London
Subject
Geology,Ocean Engineering,Water Science and Technology
Reference16 articles.
1. Brooke J. H. (1991) Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
2. John Fleming and the geological deluge
3. Frei H. W. (1974) The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative: A Study in Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Hermeneutics (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
4. Grafton A. T. (1991) Defenders of the Text: The Traditions of Scholarship in an Age of Science 1450–1800 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
5. Harrison P. (1998) The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献