Optimal source–sink matching and prospective hub–cluster configurations for CO 2 capture and storage in India

Author:

Vishal Vikram123ORCID,Singh Udayan4,Bakshi Tuli1,Chandra Debanjan15,Verma Yashvardhan167,Tiwari Ashwani Kumar8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400076, India

2. National Centre of Excellence in Carbon Capture and Utilization, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400076, India

3. Interdisciplinary Programme in Climate Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400076, India

4. Institute for Sustainability and Energy at Northwestern (ISEN), Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, United States

5. Department of Geoscience and Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN, Delft, The Netherlands

6. Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Melbourne, Australia

7. IITB-Monash Research Academy, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400076, India

8. School of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India

Abstract

Abstract At COP26, India announced strong climate commitments of reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2070. Meeting this target would likely require substantial deployment of CO 2 capture and storage (CCS) to decarbonize existing large-point sources of CO 2 . This study attempts to evaluate opportunities for deployment of CCS in India in the forthcoming decades. A geographic information system-based approach was adopted for mapping existing sources of CO 2 with the sinks. The results show that regionally-appropriate ways of moving towards CCS at scale exist in both the power and industrial sectors. Coupled analysis of these sectors with sinks shows that eight clusters may be developed throughout the country to sequester 403 Mt-CO 2 annually. These clusters are concentrated near Category-I oil basins and the Category-I coalfields (Damodar Valley), which may also create suitable financial incentives by incremental oil and coalbed methane recovery, respectively. Furthermore, a first-order costing analysis evaluates that the cost of avoidance across basins may range from –$31 to $107/t-CO 2 , depending on the type of storage reservoir and the proximity to large-point sources. A total of 12 suitable hubs and clusters were created based on annual emissions above 1 Mt-CO 2 of each large-point source and their proximity with geological sinks. Supplementary material: Frequency distribution of sources based on their distance from the sink in each cluster is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6189961

Funder

Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology

Publisher

Geological Society of London

Subject

Geology,Ocean Engineering,Water Science and Technology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3