Affiliation:
1. Swinton, Greater Manchester M27 8SD, UK
Abstract
Two species of the closely related monobathrid crinoid from the Lower Paleozoic of Scotland, namely
Macrostylocrinus cirrifer
Ramsbottom (Upper Ordovician, Katian) and
Macrostylocrinus silurocirrifer
Brower (Lower Silurian, Telychian), are similar in having elongate, unbranched radices proximally. These were not cirri, as suggested by their names, but were radices that were more or less inflexible, lacking contractile tissues. The function of these radices was uncertain. In the absence of contractile tissues, they could not have been for grasping other upright structures and crinoids do not need help to balance, their posture being maintained by mutable collagenous tissues. It is possible, but unlikely, that they may have acted to direct feeding currents towards the crown. Most probably, in an analogy to the post-Paleozoic isocrinids, the stem acted like a ‘conveyor belt’, the proximal, radicular and upright part being carried away from the cup as further columnals are inserted, eventually forming a distal, recumbent attachment structure. The elongate radices would have stabilized the dististele, but, unlike isocrinids, the arms of
Macrostylocrinus
spp. were not adapted for crawling and thus escaping predators. Both
M. silurocirrifer
(type species) and
M. cirrifer
are included in
Macrostylocrinus
(
Scotimacrostylocrinus
) subgen. nov.
Publisher
Geological Society of London
Reference52 articles.
1. Angelin, N.P. 1878. Iconographia Crinoideorum in Stratis Sueciae Siluricus Fossilium. Holmiae [Stockholm].
2. Ausich, W.I. and Donovan, S.K. 2023. Glossary of crinoid morphological terms. In: Ausich, W.I. (ed.) Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Revised, Volume 1. University of Kansas, Lawrence. Treatise Online, #167, 1–26.
3. Crinoid Ecological Morphology
4. Terminology and functional morphology of attachment structures in pelmatozoan echinoderms
5. Experimental neoichnology of crawling stalked crinoids