Understanding subsurface fluvial architecture from a combination of geological well test models and well test data

Author:

Corbett Patrick William Michael1ORCID,Duarte Gleyden Lucila Benítez12

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Petroleum Engineering, School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK

2. Ecopetrol S.A., Exploration Vicepresidency, 7th Avenue No. 32-42, Bogota, Colombia

Abstract

AbstractTwo decades of geological modelling have resulted in the ability to study single-well geological models at a sufficiently high resolution to generate synthetic well test responses from numerical simulations in realistic geological models covering a range of fluvial styles. These 3D subsurface models are useful in aiding our understanding and mapping of the geological variation (as quantified by porosity and permeability contrasts) in the near-wellbore region. The building and analysis of these models enables many workflow steps, from matching well test data to improving history-matching. Well testing also has a key potential role in reservoir characterization for an improved understanding of the near-wellbore subsurface architecture in fluvial systems. Developing an understanding of well test responses from simple through increasingly more complex geological scenarios leads to a realistic, real-life challenge: a well test in a small fluvial reservoir. The geological well testing approach explained here, through a recent fluvial case study in South America, is considered to be useful in improving our understanding of reservoir performance. This approach should lead to more geologically and petrophysically consistent models, and to geologically assisted models that are both more correct and quicker to match to history, and thus, ultimately, to more useful reservoir models. It also allows the testing of a more complex geological model through the well test response.

Publisher

Geological Society of London

Subject

Geology,Ocean Engineering,Water Science and Technology

Reference40 articles.

1. Barrero D. , Pardo A. , Vargas C.A. & Martínez J.F. 2007. Colombian Sedimentary Basins: nomenclature, boundaries, and petroleum geology, a new proposal. Agencia Nacional de Hidrocarburos, Bogota, Colombia.

2. Brayshaw A.C. , Davies R. & Corbett P.W.M. 1996. Depositional controls on primary permeability and porosity at the bedform scale in fluvial reservoir sandstones In: Carling P.A. & Dawson M. (eds) Advances in Fluvial Dynamics and Stratigraphy. Wiley, Chichester, 373–394.

3. Improving Reservoir Characterization and Simulation With Near-Wellbore Modeling

4. Corbett P.W.M. 2009. Petroleum Geoengineering: Integration of Static and Dynamic Models. SEG/EAGE Distinguished Instructor Series, 12. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK.

5. Corbett P.W.M. 2013. The role of geoengineering in oilfield development. In: Gomes J. (ed.) New Technologies in Oil and Gas Industry. Retrieved from www.intechopen.com/articles/show/title/the-role-of-geoengineering-in-field-development

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3