An engineering geological suitability comprehensive evaluation index (EGSCEI) for large-scale infrastructure site selection

Author:

Yang Peng123ORCID,Shang Yanjun4,Li Yanyan5,Li Kun6

Affiliation:

1. Tianjin Centre, China Geological Survey, Tianjin 300170, China

2. Key Laboratory of Coast Geo-Environment, China Geological Survey, Tianjin 300170, China

3. North China Centre for Geoscience Innovation, China Geological Survey, Tianjin 300170, China

4. Key Laboratory of Shale Gas and Geoengineering, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China

5. Faculty of Urban Construction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

6. General Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Planning and Design, Ministry of Water Resources, Beijing 100120, China

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present a quantitative method for evaluating the engineering geological suitability of potential sites in order to select the optimal site for large-scale infrastructure. Based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation decision method and analytic hierarchy process (AHP), an engineering geological suitability comprehensive evaluation index (EGSCEI) model was applied in the selection of a site for the construction of the China Initiative Accelerator-Driven System (CiADS) and the High-Intensity Heavy-Ion Accelerator Facility (HIAF). In this model, seven parameters, including land use, geomorphology, geological structure, lithology, hydrogeology, geological disaster and rock weathering, were selected as the evaluation factors. The factor evaluation matrices were established, and the weight vector of the seven factors was determined using the AHP. The engineering geological suitability fuzzy comprehensive evaluation vectors were then computed. Finally, according to the normalized engineering geological suitability comprehensive evaluation vectors and the quantified evaluation ranking vector, the EGSCEI values were calculated. As a result, site No. 3 was evaluated as the most optimal site of the three potential sites for the construction of the CiADS and HIAF. The result was adopted by the Chinese government, and site No. 3 became the selected location. This case study shows that the EGSCEI model is scientific, reasonable and applicable in providing a reference for similar large-scale infrastructure site selection.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

National Basic Research Program of China

China Geological Survey

Publisher

Geological Society of London

Subject

Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Reference45 articles.

1. Geographical information systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) integration for sustainable landfill site selection considering dynamic data source

2. Economic and social impact of large-sized scientific facilities;Chen G.;Studies in Dialectics of Nature,2014

3. The ways to realize the function of science popularization of large scientific device;Chen X.;Studies on Science Popularization,2015

4. Exploring quantitative methods for project location selection

5. Multi-criteria site selection for offshore renewable energy platforms

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3