Future developments for ground models

Author:

de Freitas Michael H.12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Engineering Geology, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK

2. First Steps Ltd, Hurlingham Studios, Ranelagh Gardens, London SW6 3PA, UK

Abstract

A ground model is now an accepted part of any ground engineering that requires a prediction to be made of how the ground on and around a site will respond to the engineering changes caused by construction. However, until now it has not been possible to quantify how predictions of such responses can be improved by developing the ground model. Thanks to the instrumentation provided by glass fibres that can be inserted into the ground, a stream of factual evidence of ground response to engineering change has been provided from measuring the Brillouin spectra of fibres as they deform. Thus, it is both possible and timely to research the ways in which a ground model can be improved to assist the quantitative prediction of ground response to engineering change. This paper outlines and summarizes key areas where further work is needed. The fundamental need is to enable a ground model to be a quantitative source for predicting ground response; ways for achieving this, through the development of field and laboratory testing, are described. Augmenting the currently accepted descriptions of rocks and soils will also be needed as these are biased towards describing what earth materials ‘are’ when what is also needed are descriptions of what earth materials ‘do’; that is, how they respond to change. Such descriptions include all scales of observation from the ‘mass’ to the ‘material’; however, there are inherent problems with quantifications that cross scales. A ground model will contain information that crosses many scales from 1:1 to 1:50 000 and a better understanding is required of what a mix of scales does to the data generated from such models. Attention must also be paid to the inputs made from non-geologists and how they can be incorporated into a ground model, especially those from drillers and laboratory staff. These are the people who probably see more of the ground than most consultants and designers, and how it responds to drilling and testing; that is, to engineering change, the very topic that needs to be strengthened in ground models. Such practitioners will need appropriate teaching and training for them to make these contributions. The research for such advances is an ideal field for those in academia who wish to collaborate with industry; it is technically possible and timely.Thematic collection:This article is part of the Ground models in engineering geology and hydrogeology collection available at:https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/Ground-models-in-engineering-geology-and-hydrogeology

Publisher

Geological Society of London

Subject

Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Reference39 articles.

1. ASTM 2014. D4428/D4428M – 14. Standard Test Methods for Crosshole Seismic Testing 1. American Association for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, https://doi.org/10.1520/D4428_D4428M-14

2. Bristow, C.R. and Lott, G.K. 1994. The stratigraphy and building stone potential of the Portland Beds in the western part of the Vale of Wardour. In: A geological assessment for the Commissioners of Salisbury Cathedral. Technical Report. British Geological Survey, Keyworth.

3. Bristow, C.R. and Lott, G.K. 1995. The stratigraphy and building stone potential of the Portland Beds between Tisbury and Chilmark in the Vale of Wardour. In: A geological assessment for the Commissioners of Salisbury Cathedral. Technical Report. British Geological Survey, Keyworth.

4. BS 5930 2015. Code of Practice for Ground Investigations. British Standards Institution, London.

5. Butenuth, C. 2001. Strength and Weathering of Rock as Boundary Layer Problems. Imperial College Press, London.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Methodologies for Mapping in Large Rock Excavations in Hazardous Geotechnical Contexts;Advances in Natural Hazards and Volcanic Risks: Shaping a Sustainable Future;2023

2. In Situ Geotechnical Investigations;Advances on Testing and Experimentation in Civil Engineering;2022-08-18

3. The Role of Engineering Geology Mapping and GIS-Based Tools in Geotechnical Practice;Advances on Testing and Experimentation in Civil Engineering;2022-08-18

4. Development of the ground model in an area of significant faulting and periglacial legacy: case study from Royal Tunbridge Wells, Kent;Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology;2021-02-05

5. Getting the basic ground model right in engineering practice;Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology;2020-11-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3