Abstract
AbstractFor historical reasons science today has substantially more evidence for males and men than for females and women, which means that quality of research and innovation outcomes may often be worse for women than for men. I explore how the gender dimension—a term used to mean effects of biological (sex) and/or socio-cultural (gender) characteristics—fits into new materials research and engineering and especially in nano-materials applications. Horizon Europe expects that grant proposals should include explanation if gender dimension is relevant to the project’s objectives. This paper shows that often the answer should be yes it is.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Materials Science
Reference32 articles.
1. Recommendations for Action on the Gender Dimension in Science, Portia, June 2010, https://www.portiaweb.org.uk/assets/docs/genSET_consensus_report.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2021
2. J.D. Greenspan et al., Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: a consensus report. Pain 132, S26–S45 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.014
3. C.E. Kalpit Shah et al., Do you know the sex of your cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 306, C3–C18 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00281.2013
4. A. Linder, W. Svedberg, Review of average sized male and female occupant models in European regulatory safety assessment tests and European laws: gaps and bridging suggestions. Accid. Anal. Prev. 127, 156–162 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.030
5. EU, European Commission, She Figures, https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/she-figures-2018_en. Accessed 24 May 2021
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献