Abstract
AbstractWe examine the impact of writing-to-learn (WTL) on promoting conceptual understanding of introductory materials science and engineering, including crystal structures, stress–strain behavior, phase diagrams, and corrosion. We use an analysis of writing products in comparison with pre/post concept-inventory-style assessments. For all topics, statistically significant improvements between draft and revision scores are apparent. For the stress–strain and phase diagram WTL assignments that require synthesis of qualitative data into quantitative formats, while emphasizing microstructure-properties correlations, the highest WTL effect sizes and medium-to-high gains on corresponding assessments are observed. We present these findings and suggest strategies for future WTL design and implementation.
Graphic abstract
Funder
university of michigan third century initiative
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Materials Science
Reference42 articles.
1. P.D. Klein, P. Boscolo, Trends in research on writing as learning activity. Journal of Writing Research 7, 311 (2016)
2. J. Emig, Writing as a mode of learning. Coll. Compos. Commun. 28, 122 (1977)
3. D. Galbraith, Conditions for discovery through writing. Instr. Sci. 21, 45 (1992)
4. P. D. Klein, N. Arcon, S. Baker, in Writing to learn, ed. by C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham, J. Fitzgerald. Handbook of Writing Research, 2nd edn. (The Guilford Press, New York, 2015)
5. L.P. Rivard, A review of writing to learn in science: implications for practice and research. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 31, 969 (1994)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献