Author:
Diaz-Maurin François,Ewing Rodney C.
Abstract
AbstractRecent efforts have been made toward the integration of the back-end of the nuclear fuel cycle in the United States. The back-end integration seeks to address several management challenges: 1) current storage practices are not optimized for transport and disposal; 2) the impact of interim storage on the disposal strategy needs to be evaluated; and 3) the back-end is affected by—and affects—nuclear fuel cycle and energy policy choices. The back-end integration accounts for the various processes of nuclear waste management—onsite storage, consolidated storage, transport and geological disposal. Ideally, these processes should be fully coupled so that benefits and impacts can be assessed at the level of the full fuel cycle. The paper summarizes the causes and consequences of the absence of integration at the backend of the nuclear fuel cycle in the U.S., critically reviews ongoing integration efforts, and suggests a framework that would support the back-end integration.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,Condensed Matter Physics,General Materials Science
Reference37 articles.
1. U.S. NWTRB, Survey of National Programs for Managing High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel: A Report to Congress and the Secretary of Energy (United States Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, Arlington, VA, 2009).
2. J. Carter, Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste Inventory Report (Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, South Carolina, USA, 2018).
3. R.P. Rechard, L.L. Price, and E.A. Kalinina, Integrating Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from Generation to Disposal (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 2015), p. 45.
4. U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (2019).
5. E.J. Bonano, E.A. Kalinina, and P.N. Swift, MRS Advances 3, 991 (2018).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献