Author:
Roy Della M.,Luke Karen,Diamond Sidney
Abstract
AbstractFly ashes are currently being produced that are much more widely different from each other in composition and other characteristics than had been previously experienced, owing to the widespread use of low rank subbituminous and lignitic coals. The current ASTM classifications into Class F and Class C pozzolan categories are not adequate to describe all their important properties. Current characterization methods are reviewed, including physical characterization by particle size distribution, shape, apparent specific gravity, content of hollow grains and of residual coal fragments, etc., chemical procedures of various kinds, and SEM, EDXA, XRD, and other methods for the determination of mineralogical content and glass character. Etching and chemical dissolution procedures are particularly important. The state of these various methods, current results of their use in rly ash characterizations, and the relations of these to reactivity and performance of fly ashes in cement and concrete are discussed.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Quantitative determination of fly ash in the hydrated fly ash - CaSO4·2H2OCa(OH)2 system
2. [14] Schlorholtz S. and Demirel T. , Determination of Free Lime (CaO) in Fly Ashes (this Symposium).
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献