Good Offies, Conciliation, and Mediation in the WTO: Challenges and Perspectives

Author:

Abstract

Article 5 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes lists means of pacifi settlement of disputes that can be used alongside with settlement of a particular dispute or instead of it. Good offies, conciliation and mediation are an adherence of WTO dispute settlement mechanism to the principle of pacifi settlement of disputes in international law enshrined in United Nations Charter and reminder of diplomatic approach that was dominating in the previous GATT system. Nowadays, non-litigious ways of dispute settlement in WTO have a potential to be on rise, due to crisis situation caused by US in Appellate Body and Dispute Settlement Body in general. This article looks into the reasons why means enshrined in the Article 5 were not used by Member states frequently enough since their establishment of the WTO. It looks closely into defiitions and history of the Article 5. The authors come to a conclusion that mediation has a potential and perspectives to be used more frequently in the future of the WTO dispute settlement. Mediation is treated as a unique mechanism that can be used by developing and least-developed countries to receive third-party assistance and mitigate power imbalances. Factors for successful mediation are deducted from the case analysis and interviews with representatives of permanent missions.

Publisher

Ural State Law University

Reference26 articles.

1. Collier J., Lowe V. The Settlement of International Disputes: Institutions and Procedures, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999, 395 p.

2. Glazatova M. K., Biryukova O. V., Vysotskaya A. A. Pravila VTO i osnovy torgovoi politiki [Rules of the WTO and Basics of the Trade Policy], Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2017, 624 p.

3. Handbook on the WTO Dispute Settlement System, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2017, 414 p.

4. Hansel T. P. Developing Countries and the WTO: the Need for More Mediation, Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 2004, vol. 9, pp. 331–388.

5. Horlick G. The Consultation Phase of the WTO Dispute Resolution: a Private Practitioner’s View, The International Lawyer, 2003, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 685–693.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3